Review of Literature SlideShare: Find, Use & Create Better PPTs

Introduction

If you’ve searched review of literature slideshare before a seminar or proposal presentation, you already know why it’s popular: SlideShare decks are quick to scan, visually structured, and often easier to understand than a long chapter when you’re trying to figure out how to present your literature review. The problem is that not every deck is reliable, and using the wrong one can leave you with outdated ideas, weak frameworks, or—worst case—slides that look copied.

This guide shows you how to use review of literature slideshare content the smart way: how to find the best decks, how to judge quality, how to extract structure without stealing content, and how to build your own literature review presentation that looks confident and research-ready.

Why people search “review of literature slideshare” in the first place

There’s nothing wrong with using SlideShare as a reference point. Students search review of literature slideshare because slides solve three real problems:

1. They show structure fast
   You can see the flow: problem → themes → gap → framework.
2. They make synthesis visual
   Theme maps, matrices, PRISMA diagrams, and frameworks are easier to grasp on a slide.
3. They help you design your own PPT
   Many students don’t struggle with reading; they struggle with presenting. SlideShare helps with the “what goes on which slide” confusion.

The key is using review of literature slideshare decks as templates for structure—not as content to copy.

What SlideShare is good for 

A strong review of literature slideshare deck can help you learn:

• how to group studies into themes
• how to phrase a research gap clearly
• how to present methods used by previous researchers
• how to show a conceptual framework without messy arrows
• how many slides to use in a 10–15 minute talk

But SlideShare is not a replacement for journal reading. A review of literature slideshare deck is not a peer-reviewed source, and many slides omit important details like sample sizes, tool validity, or limitations.

Use SlideShare for presentation logic. Use journals and books for research evidence.

How to find better “review of literature slideshare” decks 

Searching within SlideShare can be hit-or-miss. You’ll usually get stronger results by using Google.

1) Use Google’s site filter

Try:

• site:slideshare.net "review of literature" "your topic"
• site:slideshare.net "literature review" "your topic"
• "review of literature" "your topic" slideshare

This simple trick often finds higher-quality review of literature slideshare decks than the platform’s internal search.

2) Add method keywords

If you’re preparing a research seminar, method terms help narrow down academic decks:

• “conceptual framework”
• “research gap”
• “systematic review”
• “PRISMA”
• “SEM”
• “thematic analysis”

Adding one method keyword can turn a broad review of literature slideshare search into something genuinely useful.

3) Search by discipline terms

Different disciplines label things differently. For example:

• Management: “SERVQUAL,” “technology adoption,” “customer satisfaction”
• Health sciences: “prevalence,” “risk factors,” “clinical profile”
• Education: “engagement,” “learning outcomes,” “pedagogy”
• Engineering/CS: “benchmark,” “evaluation metrics,” “architecture”

Discipline terms reduce irrelevant review of literature slideshare results quickly.

How to tell whether a SlideShare deck is worth trusting

Not every review of literature slideshare deck is built from real academic reading. Use this checklist before you rely on one:

Green flags (good signs)

• Author name and affiliation are clear
• Date/year is visible
• Citations appear (even short ones like Author, Year)
• Slides are theme-based (not one slide per paper)
• There’s a clear gap slide
• Methods are discussed (designs, tools, limitations)

Red flags (avoid these)

• No citations anywhere
• Buzzwords with no evidence
• Outdated statistics presented as current
• Screenshots of papers with no explanation
• Slides that look like a marketing pitch rather than research

A low-quality deck can make your own presentation weak—even if it looks “nice.”

The ethical rule: use “review of literature slideshare” for structure, not sentences

This is the line you shouldn’t cross. If you want to use review of literature slideshare decks safely:

• Copy the slide order (problem → themes → gap → framework)
• Copy the diagram idea (theme map, matrix, PRISMA flow)
• Rebuild everything in your own words
• Use your own sources and citations from journals/books

If you copy slide text, you create two risks: plagiarism and weak understanding. You’ll feel it immediately when your supervisor asks questions and the slide content isn’t truly yours.

What to extract from a “review of literature slideshare” deck (high value items)

If you’re using review of literature slideshare wisely, these are the best takeaways:

1) Theme map ideas

How many themes do they use? How are they named?
Most strong decks use 4–6 themes, not 12.

2) Gap slide structure

The best decks follow a simple gap logic:

• What is known
• What is unclear/missing
• What the study will do

3) Methods comparison format

Good decks show a compact methods table:

• design, sample, tool, key finding, limitation

4) Conceptual framework style

Even if you use different variables, the visual style matters: clean boxes, consistent arrows, minimal clutter.

These are the elements that make review of literature slideshare decks helpful without encouraging copying.

Build your own literature review PPT

If you want your presentation to look professional, here’s a proven structure. Many good review of literature slideshare decks follow something similar.

Slide 1: Title

• research title (working is fine)
• your name, department, guide, date

Slide 2: Problem context

• why the topic matters (3–5 bullets)
• one strong statistic (optional)

Slide 3: Aim + research question/objectives

• aim in one line
• 2–4 objectives OR one research question

Slide 4: Search approach (optional)

• databases used
• years covered
• keyword blocks
• number of papers screened (approx.)

Slide 5: Theme map (overview slide)

• list your themes as a diagram
• one line per theme

Slides 6–9: Theme slides (core of your review)

For each theme slide:

• what most studies agree on (2–3 bullets)
• where studies disagree/limitations (1–2 bullets)
• 2–4 anchor citations

Slide 10: Methods used in prior research

• common designs (cross-sectional, experimental, qualitative)
• common tools/scales
• common analysis methods

Slide 11: Gap slide (most important)

• known → missing → your plan (3–6 bullets max)

Slide 12: Conceptual framework / hypotheses (if relevant)

• simple model diagram

Slide 13: Summary + next steps

• 3 takeaways
• what you will do next (timeline)

This is how you create a high-quality presentation inspired by review of literature slideshare—without looking like you copied anything.

How to keep your slides readable

A big reason review of literature slideshare decks look “good” is because they respect readability.

Use these rules:

• Headings: 28–32 pt
• Bullets: 20–24 pt
• Max 6 bullets per slide
• One idea per slide
• Minimal colors (2–3 consistent colors)
• Prefer diagrams over paragraphs

Avoid text walls. Your supervisor should listen to you, not read your slides.

How to handle citations in slides without clutter

The most common problem in a review of literature slideshare-style PPT is citation overload. Keep it simple:

• Use (Author, Year) at end of bullet points
• Or use [1], [2] and keep one “Key References” slide at the end
• Don’t include full APA references on every slide unless your department specifically demands it

Always cite the original paper, not the SlideShare deck.

Can you cite SlideShare in your thesis?

Technically, you can cite SlideShare as a web source, but in most dissertations it’s better to cite the journal articles the slides refer to. A review of literature slideshare deck is a secondary summary, not primary research.

If you must cite a SlideShare deck (for example, a university lecture deck with original material), do it clearly and sparingly—and still prioritize peer-reviewed sources in your literature review chapter.

Common mistakes students make when using “review of literature slideshare”

1. Copying text and changing a few words
   This is easy to detect and often increases similarity reports. Use structure only.
2. Presenting paper-by-paper summaries
   A good presentation is thematic. Don’t make one slide per paper.
3. Skipping the gap slide
   This is the most common reason supervisors dislike literature review presentations. Always include a gap slide.
4. Using outdated decks without checking recent research
   A deck from 2016 may be beautifully designed and completely outdated. Update content with current studies.
5. Overloading with citations
   Choose anchor papers. More citations don’t automatically mean better synthesis.

If you avoid these, your review of literature slideshare inspiration becomes a real advantage instead of a risk.

A fast workflow: build your PPT in one day (if you’re late)

If you need a review of literature slideshare-style PPT quickly:

1. List 4–6 themes (30 minutes)
2. Pick 3 anchor papers per theme (45 minutes)
3. Write one “consensus” bullet and one “tension” bullet per theme (45 minutes)
4. Build slides using the blueprint above (2–3 hours)
5. Rehearse once and cut 20% text (30 minutes)

Rehearsal is where you catch unclear gaps and overloaded slides. It’s also where your PPT starts sounding like research, not reading notes.

Where Anushram fits in

Sometimes your slides are technically correct but still feel unclear—especially the gap slide and conceptual framework. That’s where feedback helps most.

Anushram is a collaborative platform where researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals connect to share knowledge, exchange ideas, and support each other across domains. If you’re using review of literature slideshare decks for structural inspiration, a research-focused community like Anushram can help you refine theme grouping, sharpen your gap statement, and improve slide clarity—so your final presentation looks original and defensible.

FAQs

Is it okay to use review of literature slideshare decks for my seminar?

Yes, as inspiration for structure and slide flow. Avoid copying text and always use your own citations from original studies.

How many papers should I include in a literature review PPT?

You don’t need to display every paper. In most cases, 2–4 anchor citations per theme slide is enough.

What is the most important slide in a literature review PPT?

The gap slide. If your audience doesn’t understand the gap, the presentation won’t feel research-ready.

Conclusion

A good review of literature slideshare deck is useful when you treat it like a blueprint for presentation structure—not a source of sentences. Use SlideShare to learn slide flow, theme grouping, gap presentation, and framework design. Then rebuild everything using your own reading and your own voice.

If you want one simple next step: find one strong review of literature slideshare deck in your discipline, copy only its slide order into your own PPT, and rebuild every slide using your own synthesis and citations. That’s how you get the benefit—without any risk.

Call / WhatsApp: +91 96438 02216
Visit: https://www.anushram.com