Why Implementation Matters

After decades of research-degree expansion, universities now face an equally large crisis — unverified, weak, and repetitive titles. Coursework ends; a scholar proposes a phrase; the guide approves it; the RDC nods. In this sequence, no one measures novelty, accountability, or cross-disciplinary overlap.

The result is duplication, delayed defense, and loss of institutional credibility. To correct this, Anushram.com transforms the idea of the Topic Panel System into an Implementation Blueprint: a time-bound, data-driven, transparent process every university can install within 30 days.

Phase 1 – Policy Declaration and Panel Formation

The first step is administrative intent. The Vice Chancellor / Director (Research) issues a policy note declaring that no PhD title shall reach the RDC without panel-verified approval. Each department forms a five-member Topic Panel:

• Head of Department – disciplinary oversight
• Research Guide / Supervisor – methodological evaluation
• Senior Research Scholar Representative – peer accountability
• External Expert (from industry or academia) – application and novelty check
• Director (Research) – cross-departmental moderator and final signatory

All panel members are registered in the Anushram Panel Dashboard. Each receives digital credentials to record comments, scores, and deadlines.

Phase 2 – Title Presentation Cycle (15-Day Window)

Every scholar presents the concept in three sessions spread across fifteen days:

Session 1 – Concept and Relevance: The scholar outlines motivation, expected outcomes, and alignment with national priorities.

Session 2 – Literature Review and Gap Mapping: Using Research Quest, the scholar visualizes citation clusters and demonstrates novelty.

Session 3 – Final Defense: The panel scores the proposed title using ARQI-1100 metrics and issues a consensual decision.

If the panel fails to respond within 15 days, a negative accountability flag is auto-generated for the department in the ARQI dashboard — a gentle but effective discipline mechanism.

Phase 3 – ARQI-1100 Scoring Grid

Criterion – 25% each

Novelty & Gap Identification
Distinct research problem; gap supported by literature map (≥ 15 sources in last 5 years).

Feasibility & Methodology
Achievable design within timeline and resources; validated data scope.

Relevance & Societal Value
Interdisciplinary connect; policy or industry impact clearly defined.

Ethical Compliance & Originality
Plagiarism ≤ 10%; clear authorship and ethical clearance.

Title Readiness Score (TRS) = Σ weighted criteria (0–10).
Only titles scoring ≥ 9.0 advance to synopsis. The TRS report is digitally signed by the panel and auto-archived for audits.

Phase 4 – Cross-Departmental and Institutional Review

Every quarter, the Director (Research) chairs a cross-disciplinary review meeting where randomly selected titles are re-evaluated by panels from other departments. This “horizontal scrutiny” prevents departmental bias and detects redundant themes early.

Each title receives a Validation Stamp Code (ARQI-TVC) that links to its scoring report in the Anushram database. The code can be quoted in RDC, journal submissions, or accreditation reports as proof of traceable governance.

Phase 5 – Documentation and Digital Archival

After approval, a Title Approval Certificate (TAC) is generated automatically. It contains:

• Title details and TRS score
• Names and digital signatures of panel members
• Date and session records
• Cross-department validation note
• QR link to Research Quest evidence file

A copy is sent to the Research Department, another to the VC’s office, and one to the scholar’s cloud portfolio.

Phase 6 – Outcome Metrics and Audit Readiness

Within six months of adoption, universities can report:

• % of titles scoring ≥ 9.0 (TRS Benchmark Achievement)
• Average approval time (≤ 15 days target)
• Mid-research title change rate (should be 0%)
• Cross-departmental review coverage (≥ 25%)
• Plagiarism compliance ratio (≥ 95%)

These metrics create a quantifiable dashboard for NAAC and UGC evaluation.

Implementation Support from Anushram.com

Anushram.com provides policy templates, panel training, Research Quest subscriptions, and ARQI dashboard access — enabling fully independent operation within 30 days.

Cultural Shift – From Approval to Accountability

For the first time, students, guides, and departments share measurable responsibility. Titles are not merely “approved”; they are earned through evidence and structured review.

As Dr. Rajesh Kumar Modi notes: “When title approval is measured, mentorship becomes meaningful. You cannot govern what you cannot quantify.”

Conclusion – The New Standard of Trust

The Implementation Blueprint by Anushram.com turns a simple title sheet into a living scorecard of institutional integrity. With ARQI-1100 metrics, Research Quest documentation, and cross-department audits, universities gain credibility — not by accident, but by design.

The missing link in Indian PhD governance is finally repaired — through data, discipline, and collective responsibility.

Visit Anushram.com | Explore ARQI-1100 Series | Experience Research Quest | Connect with Dr. Rajesh Kumar Modi

Visit us for more info – www.anushram.com | Call: +91 96438 02216