Anushram.com – The Corporate Company in Research Bringing Scientific Validation to Title Selection

Why is deciding a research title the hardest yet most crucial task? Because the title defines what will be discovered, measured and finally defended in front of experts. A weak title creates confusion at every later stage. A strong, scientifically validated title gives clarity, direction and confidence from day one.

At Anushram.com, the focus is simple – titles are not casually written, they are engineered. Every scholar is taken through a structured, data-backed journey, from temporary working idea to quantified title validation supported by literature, logic and numeric scoring.

From Working Idea to Validated Research Title

Anushram follows a clear three phase pathway that mirrors how real research thinking should evolve in a modern, quantifiable ecosystem.

Phase 1 – Temporary Title Identification

Every journey begins with a broad working title drawn from the scholar s subject area, interests and early keywords. At this stage, the purpose is not perfection but direction.

Example in Management: Digital Empowerment and Employee Agility in SMEs.

This temporary title becomes the base reference for the next scientific stages rather than a fixed label.

Phase 2 – Keyword Based Literature Review

Instead of random reading, Anushram deploys a structured literature review table model. Scholars are guided to study around 30 to 45 relevant papers, each documented in a single unified format that captures what really matters.

The table typically captures the following columns:

• Title of the paper
• Author and year
• Core summary of the work
• Problem addressed
• Identified research gap
• Methodology used
• Novelty elements
• Key findings
• Statistical tools or software used
• Possible recommended title direction

For example, a paper by Smith and Lee (2023) on SME digital adoption may highlight poor integration and lack of behavioural linkage, use regression and SEM, and recommend a refined thematic direction like Behavioural Enablers of SME Digitalisation.

Each such row is not just text. It is a scored data point that later feeds into Anushram s validation engine.

Phase 3 – Scientific Iteration with ASTVAMREI 100+

Once enough literature entries are collected, Anushram applies its proprietary ASTVAMREI 100+ and Advancium validation algorithm. Together, they quantify topic feasibility and strength across multiple dimensions, converting qualitative impressions into measurable indicators.

This process helps narrow down broad ideas into 5 to 6 sharp, scientifically grounded title options, ready for higher level validation.

The Anushram Literature Review Table Model – Turning Reading into Data

Traditional literature review often becomes a narrative summary with little analytical power. The Anushram literature table transforms this into a strategic decision tool.

For every article, the scholar captures:

• Title and author details
• One short, focused summary
• The core problem investigated
• Clear research gap in that study
• Methodology and design
• Novelty point or contribution
• Main findings and implications
• Tools, software and statistics used
• A possible title suggestion or keyword direction

Over time, patterns emerge – repeating problems, under explored gaps, methods that work and those that do not. Anushram then links these parameters with keywords and topics to generate validated, high potential title options.

Scientific Validation Under ARQI 1100

At the heart of Anushram s approach is the ARQI 1100 framework that brings scientific structure to title evaluation. Under this model, multiple criteria are checked using the ASTVAMREI code based lens, including:

• A – Research Gaps Identification: how clearly the problem and gap are justified.
• S – Solutions or Models Proposed: whether the topic allows measurable, replicable solutions.
• T – Topic Novelty and Originality: uniqueness and innovation quotient.
• D – Data Validation and Feasibility: practical access to reliable data.
• M – Methodological Design Strength: whether the design allows robust statistical analysis.
• Q – Analytical Quantification Potential: scope for numerical or model based evaluation.
• P – Publication or Manuscript Relevance: alignment with journal scope and expectations.
• R – Research Integrity and Ethics: ethical feasibility and plagiarism discipline.
• E – Execution and Replicability: ability of others to replicate or extend the work.
• F – Implementation Feasibility: potential to apply findings in real settings.
• I – Impact Orientation: societal, policy or industry level significance.

These dimensions together ensure that a title is not only interesting but also doable, ethical and impactful.

From Iteration to Final Title Validation

After the ARQI and ASTVAMREI matrix is scored, Anushram s system usually generates six potential titles that match the scholar s domain and gaps noted in literature.

For each title, the scholar receives:

• A 100 point evaluation sheet showing strengths and weaknesses
• Commentary on feasibility, data access and publication readiness
• Notes on which journals and conferences the topic aligns with

The final recommended title is therefore scientifically defensible. It is not chosen by guesswork but supported by numbers, gaps and structured reasoning. Scholars then receive an official Anushram Title Validation Report, a first of its kind document that can be used during university panels, RDC sessions or guide discussions.

How This Process Changes the Research Culture

The Anushram model does more than help one scholar. It gradually changes the research culture inside universities.

• Guesswork is replaced by evidence: every title decision leaves a traceable data trail.
• Q1 and Q2 journal readiness increases: titles are aligned with international keyword, gap and method expectations.
• Research confidence grows: students defend their topics using scorecards, not just emotional arguments.
• Ethical discipline is embedded: plagiarism is kept below 10 percent and COPE style ethics are emphasised from the title stage itself.

As a result, guides, departments and scholars move together with shared clarity.

Research Quest – The Parallel Engine Powering Decisions

Behind the scenes, Anushram s proprietary platform Research Quest acts as the live engine for title and literature validation.

With Research Quest, scholars can:

• Run structured literature mapping based on keywords and domains
• Simulate how different title versions may perform in terms of gaps and methods
• Identify citation rich keywords with higher publication potential
• Store all validation reports and feedback in one place

This integration ensures that every scholar moves from passive reading to quantified, interactive research planning.

Conclusion – From Idea to Impact with Scientific Assurance

Through the synergy of ARQI 1100, ASTVAMREI 100+ and Research Quest, Anushram.com converts the most uncertain stage of research – title selection – into a measurable, review proof and globally aligned process.

When research begins with precision, it usually ends with excellence. At Anushram, the journey from idea to impact is designed to be quantified, ethical and international in outlook.

About the Author

Dr Rajesh Kumar Modi is the founder of Anushram.com – The Corporate Company in Research – and the architect of the ARQI 1100 framework that promotes quantified academic excellence.

Call: 96438 02216